Juggling haxelibs between multiple projects

Once you have more than one project you’re building in Haxe, you tend to run into situations where you use different versions of dependencies.  Often you can get away with using the latest version on every project, but sometimes there are compatibility breaks, and you need different projects to use different versions.

There is a work-in-progress issue for Haxelib to get support for per-project repositories.  Until that is finished, here is what I do:

cd ~/workspace/project1/

mkdir haxelibs

haxelib setup haxelibs

haxelib install all

And then when I switch between projects:

cd ~/workspace/project2/

haxelib setup haxelibs

What this does:

  • Switch to your current project
  • Create a folder to store all of your haxelibs for this project in
  • Set haxelib to use that folder (and when I switch to a different project, I’ll use a different local folder).
  • Install all the dependencies for this project.

Doing this means that each project can have it’s own dependencies, and upgrading a library in one project doesn’t break the compile on another project.

Hopefully that helps someone else, and hopefully the built in support comes soon!

Requiring a Class argument to have a certain constructor signiature

Haxe has a very powerful reflection API, allowing you to create objects of a class, which you don’t know until runtime.

var u:User = Type.createInstance(User, [“jason”,”mypass”]);

Sometimes, you have a method where you want to create a class, but which class is created is specified by the user:

function createUser( cls:Class<User>, u:String, p:String ) {

var u:User = Type.createInstance( cls, [u,p]);

createUser( StaffMember, “jack”, “mypass” );
createUser( Subscriber, “aaron”, “mypass” );

So far so good.  But what if we have a 3rd user class, “Moderator”, that actually has a constructor that requires 3 arguments, not just the username and password.

createUser( Moderator, “bernadette”, “mypass” );

This compiles okay, but will fail at runtime – it tries to call the constructor for Moderator with 2 arguments, but 3 are required.

My first thought was, can we use an interface and specify the constructor:

interface IUser {

public function new( user:String, pass:String ):Void


Sadly in Haxe, an interface cannot define the constructor.  I’m pretty sure the reason for this is to avoid you creating an object with no idea which implementation you are using.  Now that would work for reflection, but wouldn’t make sense for normal object oriented programming:

function createUser( cls:Class<IUser>, u:String, p:String ) {

var u:IUser = new cls(u,p); // What implementation does this use?


So it can’t be interfaces… what does work?  Typedefs:

typedef ConstructableUser = {
function new( u:String, p:String ):Void,
function save():Void

And then we can use it like so:

function createUser( cls:Class<ConstructableUser>, u:String, p:String ) {

var u:ConstructableUser = Type.createInstance( cls, [u,p]);

createUser( StaffMember, “jack”, “mypass” );
createUser( Subscriber, “aaron”, “mypass” );
createUser( Moderator, “bernadette”, “mypass” ); // ERROR – Moderator should be ConstructableUser

In honesty I was surprised that “Class<SomeTypedef>” worked, but I’m glad it does.  It provides a good mix of compile time safety and runtime reflection.  Go Haxe!

Accept either String or Int, without resorting to Dynamic

A quick code sample:

`AcceptEither`, a way to accept either one type or another, without resorting to “Dynamic”, and still have the compiler type-check everything and make sure you correctly handle every situation.

Try it on try.haxe.org

The next step would be having Accept2Types, Accept3Types etc, and have a macro automatically build the code for whichever option you ask for.

Super Quick Haxe Abstracts Example

I just posted a quick gist to the Haxe mailing list showing how one way that abstracts work.

They’re a great way to wrap a native API object (in this case, js.html.AnchorElement) without having to create a new wrapper object every single time. Which means they’re great for performance, the end result code looks clean, and thanks to some of the other abstract magic (implicit casts, operator overloading etc) there is a lot of cool things you can do.

Have a look at the sample, read the Haxe manual, and let me know what you think or if you have questions :)

Web.cacheModule and Expiring DB connections

The Story

A while ago I posted about neko.web.cacheModule, a way to make your site run dramatically faster on mod_neko or mod_tora. After spending some time making ufront compatible with this mode of running, I was excited to deploy my app to our schools with the increased performance.

I deployed, ran some tests, seemed happy, went home and slept well. And woke up the next morning to a bunch of 501 errors.

The Error

The error message was coming from the MySQL connection: “Failed to send packet”.

At first I just disabled caching, got everyone back online, and then went about trying to isolate the issue. It took a while before I could reproduce it and pinpoint it. I figured it was to do with my DB connection staying open between requests, thanks to the new module caching.

A google search showed only one Haxe related result – someone on IRC that mentioned when they sent too many SQL queries it sometimes bombed out with this error message. Perhaps leaving it open eventually overran some buffer and caused it to stop working? Turns out this was not the case, I used `ab` (Apache Benchmark tool) to query a page 100,000 times and still didn’t see the error.

Eventually I realised it was to do with the MySQL Server dropping the connection after a period of inactivity. The `wait_timeout` variable was set to 28800 by default: so after 8 hours of inactivity.  So long enough that I didn’t notice it the night before, but short enough that the timeout occured overnight while all the staff were at home or asleep… So the MySQL server dropped the connection, and my Haxe code did not know to reconnect it. Whoops.

The Solution

I looked at Nicolas’s hxwiki source code, which runs the current Haxe site for some inspiration on the proper way to approach this for `neko.Web.cacheModule`. His solution: use http://api.haxe.org/sys/db/Transaction.html#main. By the looks of it, this will wrap your entire request in an SQL transaction, and should an error be thrown, it will rollback the transaction. Beyond that, it will close the DB connection after each request. So we have a unique DB connection for each request, and close it as soon as the request is done.

My source code looks like this:

class Server
  static var ufApp:UfrontApplication;

  static function main() {
    #if (neko && !debug) neko.Web.cacheModule(main); #end
    // Wrap all my execution inside a transaction
    sys.db.Transaction.main( Mysql.connect(Config.db), function() {

  static function init() {
    // If cacheModule is working, this will only run once
    if (ufApp==null) {
      UFAdminController.addModule( "db", "Database", new DBAdminController() );
      ufApp = new UfrontApplication({
        dispatchConfig: Dispatch.make( new Routes() ),
        remotingContext: Api,
        urlRewrite: true,
        logFile: "log/ufront.log"

My Haxe Log: Week #2

This week:

  • My token one day a week I continued on my Node-Webkit project.  This time I made externs for Kue (externs, which appear to be working) and FFMpeg (externs, not functional just yet).  Still enjoying working with Node-Webkit, and with the Node-API library especially.  Sad I didn’t get to make more progress on it this week.
  •  Ufront:
      • Make tracing / logging work reliably between multiple requests. After enabling neko.Web.cacheModule(), I began to find areas where Ufront was not very multiple-request-friendly. These would have surfaced later with a port to Client JS or Node JS, but it’s good to find them now.One problem was that our tracing and logging modules were behaving as if there was only one request at a time. This could result in a trace message for one request ending up being output to somebody else’s request, which is obviously bad.

        The problem is a tricky one, as trace() always translates to haxe.Log.trace(), and you with Ufront’s multiple-request-at-a-time design, you can’t know which request is the current one from a static method. If I think of a clever way to do it, possibly involving cookies and sessions, then I might include a HttpContext.getCurrentContext() static method. This would probably have to be implemented separately for each supported platform.

        The solution for now, however, was to not keep track of log messages in the TraceModule, but in the HttpContext. Then on the onLogRequest event, the trace modules get access to the log messages for the current context, and can output them to the browser, to a file, or whichever they choose.

        The downside is that you have to use httpContext.ufTrace() rather than trace(). I added a shortcut for this in both ufront.web.Controller and ufront.remoting.RemotingApiClass, so that in your controllers or APIs you can call uftrace() and it will be associated with the current request. There is also ufLog, ufWarn and ufError.

        I also made RemotingModule work similarly with tracing and logging – so logs go to both the log file and the remoting call to the browser.

      • Fix logging in ErrorModule. One of the things that made debugging the new ufront really hard was that when there was an Error, the ErrorModule displayed, but the trace messages did not get sent to the browser or the log file. I did a bit of code cleanup and got this working now.
      • Fixed File Sessions / EasyAuth. Once able to get my traces and logs working more consistently, I was able to debug and fix the remaining issues in FileSession, so now EasyAuth is working reliably, which is great.
      • Added Login / Logout for UF-Admin. With UF-Admin, I added a login screen and logout, that works with EasyAuth for now. I guess I will make it pluggable later… For now though it means you can set up a simple website, not worry about auth for the front end, but have the backend password protected. If you use EasyAuth for your website / app, the same session will work on the ufadmin page.
      • Created uf-content for app-generated files. I moved all app-generated files (sessions, logs, temp files etc) into a folder called “uf-content”. Then I made this configurable, and relative to httpContext.request.scriptDirectory. You can configure it by changing the contentDirectory option in your UfrontConfiguration. This will make it easier when deploying, we can have instructions to make that single directory writeable but not accessible via the web, and then everything that requires FileSystem access can work reliably from there.
      • Pushed new versions of the libraries. Now that the basics are working, I pushed new versions of the libraries to Haxelib. They are marked as ufront-* with version 1.0.0-beta.1. From here it will be easy to update them individually and move towards a final release.
      • Demo Blog App. To demonstrate the basics of how it works, and a kind of “best practices” for project structure, I created a demo app, and thought I would start with a blog. I started, and the basic setup is there, including the config structure and each of the controller actions, and the “ufadmin” integration. But it’s not working just yet, needs more work.
      • Identified Hair website. I have a website for a friend’s small business that I’ve been procrastinating working on for a long time. On Saturday I finally got started on it, and set up the basic project and routes in Ufront. In about 4 hours I managed to get the project set up, all the controllers / routes working, all the content in place and a basic responsive design with CSS positioning working. All the data is either HTML, Markdown or Database Models (which get inserted into views). Once I’ve got their branding/graphics included, I’ll use ufront to provide a basic way to change data in their database. And then if they’re lucky, I might look at doing some Facebook integration to show their photo galleries on the site.

My Haxe Log: Week #1

Every week as part of my work and as part of my free time I get to work on Haxe code, and a lot of that is contributing to libraries, code, blog posts etc.  Yesterday was one of those frustrating days where I told someone I’d finish a demo ufront app and show them how it works, but I just ran into problem after problem and didn’t get it done, and was feeling pretty crap about it.

After chatting it out I looked back at my week and realised: I have done alot.  So I thought I should start keeping a log of what I’ve been working on – mostly for my own sake, so I can be encouraged by the progress I have made, even if I haven’t finished stuff yet.  But also in case anything I’m working on sparks interest or discussion – it’s cool to have people know what I’m up to.

So I’d like to start a weekly log.  It may be one of those things I do once and never again, or it may be something I make regular: but there’s no harm in doing it once.

So here we go, my first log.  In this case, it’s not just this week, some of it requires me to go back further to include things I’ve been working on, so it’s a pretty massive list:

  • Node Webkit: On Monday’s I work at Vose Seminary, a tertiary college, and I help them get their online / distance education stuff going.  Editing videos, setting up online Learning Management Systems etc.  I have a bunch of command line utils that make the video editing / exporting / transcoding / uploading process easier, but I want to get these into graphics so other staff can use it.  Originally I was thinking of using OpenFL / StablexUI.  I’m far more comfortable with the JS / Browser API than the Flash API however, and so Node-Webkit looked appealing.  On Monday I made my first Haxe-NodeJS project in over a year, using Clement’s new Node-API repo.  It’s beautiful to work with, and within an hour and a half I had written some externs and had my first “hello-world” Node-Webkit app.  I’ll be working on it again this coming Monday.
  • neko.Web.cacheModule: I discovered a way to get a significant speed-up in your web-apps.  I wrote a blog post about it.
  • Ufront: I’ve done a lot of work on Ufront this week.  After my talk at WWXthis year, I had some good chats with people and basically decided I was going to undertake a major refactor of ufront.  I’m almost done!  Things I’ve been working on this week (and the last several weeks, since it all ties in together):
    • Extending haxe.web.Dispatch (which itself required a pull request) to be subclassed, and allowing you to 1) execute the ‘dispatch’ and ‘executeAction’ steps separately and 2) allow returning a result, so that you can get the result of your dispatch methods.  This works much nicer with Ufront’s event based processing, and allows for better unit testing / module integration etc.  The next step is allowing dispatch to have asynchronous handlers (for Browser JS and Node JS).  I began thinking through how to implement this also.
    • After discovering neko.Web.cacheModule, I realised that it had many implications for Ufront.  Basically: You can use static properties for anything that is generic to the whole application, but you cannot use it for anything specific to a request.  This led to several things breaking – but also the opportunity for a much better (and very optimised) design.
    • IHttpSessionState, FileSession: the first thing that was broken was the FileSession module.  The neko version was implemented entirely using static methods, which led to some pretty broken behaviour once caching between requests was introduced.  In the end I re-worked the interface “IHttpSessionState” to be fairly minimal, and was extended by the “IHttpSessionStateSync” and “IHttpSessionStateAsync” interfaces, so that we can begin to cater for Async platforms.  I then wrote a fresh FileSession implementation that uses cookies and flat-files, and should work across both PHP and Neko (and in Future, Java/C#).  The JS target would need a FileSessionAsync implementation.
    • IAuthHandler / EasyAuth: At the conference I talked about how I had an EasyAuth library that implemented a basic User – Group – Permission model.  At the time, this also was implemented with Static methods.  Now I have created a generic interface (IAuthHandler) so that if someone comes up with an auth system other than EasyAuth, it can be compatible.  I also reworked EasyAuth to be able to work with different a) IHttpSessionState implementations and b) different IAuthAdapter’s – basically, this is an interface that just has a single method: `authenticate()`.  And it tells you if the user is logged in or not.  EasyAuth by default uses EasyAuthDBAuthAdapter, which compares a username and password against those in the database.  You could also implement something that uses OpenID, or a social media logon, or LDAP, or anything.  All this work trying to make it generic enough that different implementations can co-exist I think will definitely pay off, but for now it helps to have a well thought out API for EasyAuth :)
    • YesBoss: Sometimes you don’t want to worry about authentication.  Ufront has the ability to create a “tasks.n” command line file, which runs tasks through a Command Line Interface, rather than over the web.  When doing this, you kind of want to assume that if someone has access to run arbitrary shell commands, they’re allowed to do what they want with your app.  So now that I have a generic interface for checking authentication, I created the “YesBossAuthHandler” – a simple class that can be used wherever an authentication system is needed, but any permission check it always lets you pass.  You’re the boss, after all.
    • Dependency Injection: A while ago, I was having trouble understanding the need for Dependency Injection.  Ufront has now helped me see the need for it.  In the first app I started making with the “new” ufront, I wanted to write unit tests.  I needed to be able to jump to a piece of code – say, a method on a controller – and test it as if it was in a real request, but using a fake request.  Dependency injection was the answer, and so in that project I started using Minject.  This week, realising I had to stop using statics and singletons in things like sessions and auth handling, I needed a way to get hold of the right objects, and dependency injection was the answer.  I’ve now added it as standard in Ufront.  There is an `appInjector`, which defines things that should be injected everywhere (modules, controllers, APIs etc).  For example, injecting app configuration or a caching module or an analytics API.  Then there is the dispatchInjector, which is used to inject things into controllers, and the remotingInjector, which is used to inject things into APIs during remoting calls.  You can define things you want to make available at your app entry point (or your unit test entry point, or your standalone task runner entry point), and they will be available when you need them.  (As a side note, I now also have some great tools for mocking requests and HttpContexts using Mockatoo).
    • Tracing: Ufront uses Trace Modules.  By default it comes with two: TraceToBrowser and TraceToFile.  Both are useful, but I hadn’t anticipated some problems with the way they were designed.  In the ufront stack, modules exist at the HttpApplication level, not at the HttpRequest level.  On PHP (or uncached neko), there is little difference.  Once you introduce caching, or move to a platform like NodeJS – this becomes a dangerous assumption.  Your traces could end up displaying on somebody else’s request.  In light of this, I have implemented a way of keeping track of trace messages in the HttpContext.  My idea was to then have the Controller and RemotingApiClass have a trace() method, which would use the HttpContext’s queue.  Sadly, an instance `trace()` method currently does not override the global `haxe.Log.trace()`, so unless we can get that fixed (I’m chatting with Simon about it on IRC), it might be better to use a different name, like `uftrace()`.  For now, I’ve also made a way for TraceToBrowser to try guess the current HttpContext, but if multiple requests are executing simultaneously this might break.  I’m still not sure what the best solution is here.
    • Error Handling: I tried to improve the error handling in HttpApplication.  It was quite confusing and sometimes resulted in recursive calls through the error stack.  I also tried to improve the visual appearance of the error page.
    • Configuration / Defaults:The UfrontApplication constructor was getting absurd, with something like 6 optional parameters.  I’ve moved instead to having a `UfrontConfiguration` typedef, with all of the parameters, and you can supply, all, some or none of the parameters, and fall-backs will be used if needed.  This also improves the appearance of the code from:new UfrontApplication( true, “log.txt”, Dispatch.make(new Routes()) );


      new UfrontApplication({
      urlRewrite: true,
      dispatchConf: Dispatch.make( new Routes() ),
      logFile: “log.txt”

    • More ideas: last night I had trouble getting to sleep.  Too many ideas.  I sent myself 6 emails (yes 6) all containing new ideas for Ufront.  I’ll put them on the Ufront Trello Board soon to keep track of them.  The ideas were about Templating (similar abstractions and interfaces I have here, as well as ways of optimising them using caching / macros), an analytics module, a request caching module and setting up EasyAuth to work not only for global permissions (CanAccessAdminArea), but also for item-specific permissions: do you have permission to edit this blog post?
    • NodeJS / ClientJS: after using NodeJS earlier in the week, I had some email conversations with both Clement and Eric about using Ufront on NodeJS.  After this week it’s becoming a lot more obvious how this would work, and I’m getting close.  The main remaining task is to support asynchronous calls in these 3 things: Dispatch action execution calls, HttpRemotingConnection calls, and database calls – bringing some of the DB Macros magic to async connections.  But it’s looking possibly now, where as it looked very difficult only 3 months ago.
  • CompileTime: I added a simple CompileTime.interpolateFile() macro.  It basically reads the contents of the file at macro time, and inserts it directly into the code, but it inserts it using String Interpolation, as if you had used single quotes.  This means you can insert basic variables or function calls, and they will all go in.  It’s like a super-quick and super-basic poor-man’s templating system.  I’m already using it for Ufront’s default error page and default controller page.
  • Detox: this one wasn’t this week, but a couple of weeks ago.  I am working on refactoring my Detox (DOM / Xml Manipulation) library to use Abstracts.  It will make for a much more consistent API, better performance, and some cool things, like auto-casting strings to DOM elements:”div.content”.find().append( “<h1>My Content</h1>” );
  • My Work Project: Over the last two weeks I’ve updated SMS (my School Management System project, the main app I’ve been working on) to use the new Ufront.  This is the reason I’ve been finding so much that needs to be updated, especially trying to get my app to work with “ufront.Web.cacheModule”.


Until now I haven’t had to worry much about the speed of sites made using Haxe / Ufront,  – none of the sites or apps I’ve made have anywhere near the volume for it to be a problem, and the general performance was fast enough that no one asked questions. But I’m going to soon be a part of building the new Haxe website, which will have significant volume.

So I ran some benchmarks using ab (Apache’s benchmarking tool), and wasn’t initially happy with the results. They were okay, but not significantly faster than your average PHP framework. Maybe I would have to look at mod_tora or NodeJS for deployment.

Then I remembered something: a single line of code you can add that vastly increases the speed: neko.Web.cacheModule(main).


Here is some super dumb sample code:

class Server {
  static var staticInt = 0;
  static function main() {
    #if neko
      neko.Web.cacheModule(main); // comment out to test the difference
    var localInt = 0; 
    trace ( ++staticInt ); 
    trace ( ++localInt ); 

And I am testing with this command:

ab -n 1000 -c 20 http://localhost/ 

Here are my results (in requests/second on my laptop):

  • Apache/mod_php (no cache): 161.89
  • NekoTools server: 687.49
  • Apache/mod_neko (no cache): 1054.70
  • Apache/mod_tora (no cache): 745.94
  • Apache/mod_neko (cacheModule): 3516.04
  • Apache/mod_tora (cacheModule): 2185.30

First up: I assume mod_tora has advantages on sites that use more memory, but a dummy sample like this is more overhead than it’s worth.

Second, and related: I know these tests are almost worthless, we really need to be testing a real app, with file access and template processing and database calls.

Let’s do that, same command, same benchmark parameters:

  • Apache/mod_php (no cache): 3.6 (ouch!)
  • NekoTools server: 20.11
  • Apache/mod_neko (no cache): 48.74
  • Apache/mod_tora (no cache): 33.29
  • Apache/mod_neko (cacheModule): 351.42
  • Apache/mod_tora (cacheModule): 402.76

(Note: PHP has similar caching, using modules like PHP-APC. I’m not experienced setting these up however, and am happy with the neko performances I’m seeing so I won’t investigate further)


  • the biggest speed up (in my case) seems to come from cacheModule(), not mod_tora. I believe once memory usage increases significantly, tora brings advantages in that arena, and so will be faster due to less garbage collection.
  • this could be made faster, my app currently has very little optimisation:
    • the template system uses Xml, which I assume isn’t very fast.
    • a database connection is required for every request
    • there is no caching (memcached, redis etc)
    • I think I have some terribly ineffecient database queries that I’m sure I could optimise
  • Ufront targeting Haxe/PHP is not very fast out-of-the-box. I’m sure you could optimise it, but it’s not there yet.
  • This is running on my laptop, not a fast server. Then again, my laptop may be faster than a low end server, not sure.


So, how does it work?

#if neko neko.Web.cacheModule( main ); #end 

The conditional compilation (#if neko and #end) is just there so that you can still compile to other targets without getting errors. The cacheModule function has the following documentation:

Set the main entry point function used to handle requests.
Setting it back to null will disable code caching.

By entry point, it is usually going to mean the main() function that is called when your code first runs. So when the docs ask for a function to use as the entry point, I just use main, meaning, the static function main() that I am currently in.

I’m unsure of the impact of having multiple “.n” files or a different entry point.

The cache is reset whenever the file timestamp changes: so when you re-compile, or when you load a new “.n” file in place.

If you wanted to manually disable the cache for some reason, you use cacheModule(null). I’m not sure what the use case is for this though… why disable the cache?

Gotchas (Static variable traps with cacheModule)

The biggest gotcha is that static variables persist in your module. They are initialized just once, which is a big part of the speed increase. Let’s look at the example code I posted before:

class Server {
  static var staticInt = 0;
  static function main() {
    #if neko
      neko.Web.cacheModule(main); // comment out to test the difference
    var localInt = 0; 
    trace ( ++staticInt ); 
    trace ( ++localInt ); 

With caching disabled, both trace statements will print “0” every time. With caching enabled, the staticInt variable does not get reset – it initializes at 0, and then every single page load will continue to increment it, it will go up and up and up.

What does this mean practically:

  • If you want to cache stuff, put it in a static variable. For example:
    • Database connections: store them in a static variable and the connection will persist.
    • Templates: read from disk once, store them in a static variable
    • App Config, especially if you’re passing JSON or Xml, put it in a static and it stays cached.
  • Things which should be unique to a request, don’t store in a static variable. For example:
    • Ufront has a class called NekoSession, which was entirely static methods and variables, and made assumptions that the statics would be reset between requests. Wrong! Having the session cached between different requests (by different users) was a disaster – everytime you click a link you would find yourself logged in as a different user. Needless to say we needed to refactor this and not use statics :) To approach it differently, you could use a static var sessions:StringMap<SessionID, SessionData> and actually have it work appropriately as long as the cache stayed alive.
    • Avoid singletons like Server.currentUser, or even User.current – these static variables are most likely going to be cached between requests leading to unusual results.

Language and API Design

Paul Graham has written some great essays over time, and most of them hold up surprisingly well as they age.  Take this article, “Five Questions About Language Design“.  Written in May 2001.  That’s over 12 years ago from today as I read it, and many of his predictions have come to pass (the dominance of web applications, the rise in popularity of niche programming languages), and most of his logic is still sound, and still insightful.

Two particular points I found interesting, and would be interesting to the Haxe community I spend most of my time in:

4. A Language Has to Be Good for Writing Throwaway Programs.

You know what a throwaway program is: something you write quickly for some limited task. I think if you looked around you’d find that a lot of big, serious programs started as throwaway programs. I would not be surprised if most programs started as throwaway programs. And so if you want to make a language that’s good for writing software in general, it has to be good for writing throwaway programs, because that is the larval stage of most software.

I think Haxe is beginning to show it’s strength here in gaming.  People are using it for Ludlam Dare (write a game in a single weekend), and then later the game scales up to be a full-featured, multi-platform, often commercial game.  Haxe is good for a quick win (especially when targetting flash), but then you have the options to target so many other platforms as your vision for your game/app expands.

I’d love to see ufront get this good.  I have so many things I would like to use as an app, but which I don’t feel justify an ongoing subscription to an online company.  Many of them could get an MVP (minimal viable product) out in a weekend, if the framework was good enough.  And it’s getting good enough, but still a little way to go :)

And then this:

2. Speed Comes from Profilers.

Language designers, or at least language implementors, like to write compilers that generate fast code. But I don’t think this is what makes languages fast for users. Knuth pointed out long ago that speed only matters in a few critical bottlenecks. And anyone who’s tried it knows that you can’t guess where these bottlenecks are. Profilers are the answer.

Language designers are solving the wrong problem. Users don’t need benchmarks to run fast. What they need is a language that can show them what parts of their own programs need to be rewritten. That’s where speed comes from in practice. So maybe it would be a net win if language implementors took half the time they would have spent doing compiler optimizations and spent it writing a good profiler instead.

Nice insight.  I sometimes worry that the code I’m writing will be slow.  It’s hard to know if optimisations are worth it, especially if it may compromise code readability etc.  A better solution would be to focus on making profiling easy.  On the JS target you can easily use the browser tools to show profiling information.  Another option is to bake it into your Haxe code, something that the “massivecover” lets you do.  Wiring that support from massivecover into ufront or other frameworks, and generating pretty reports, would be a very cool way to encourage people to write fast apps.

You cannot use @:build inside a macro : make sure that your enum is not used in macro

If you ever come across this error, it can be a bit cryptic to understand.

Here’s some sample code that produces the error:

import haxe.macro.Expr;
import haxe.macro.Context;
import neko.Lib;

class BuildInMacroTests 
    public static function main() {
        var s:MyModel = new MyModel();
        MyMacro.doSomething( s );

class MyModel extends sys.db.Object // has a build macro
    var id:Int;
    var name:String;

private class MyMacro 
    public static macro function doSomething(output : Expr) : Expr {
        return output;

I’m still not sure I have a full grasp on it, but here’s a few pointers:

  • It’s not necessarily an enum – it can happen with a class or interface that has a “@:build” macro also.
  • The basic sequence happens in this order:
    • BuildInMacrosTest.main() is the entry point, so the compiler starts there and starts processing.
    • When it hits “var s:MyModel”, it does a lookup of that type, realizes the class needs a build macro to run, and runs the build macro.
    • When it hits “MyMacro.doSomething()”, it types the expression, and realizes that it is a macro call.  To run the macro, it must find the macro class, load it into the macro context, and execute it.
    • It finds the macro class, it’s in this file.
    • It tries to load this module (hx file) into the macro context, so it goes through the whole process of typing it again.
    • As it’s loading it into the macro context, it hits the “MyModel” build macro again, which it can’t do at macro time, so it spews out the error.
  • The basic solutions:
    • Wrap your build macro declarations in conditionals:
      #if !macro @:build(MyMacro.build()) #end class Object { ... }
    • Wrap anything that is not a macro in conditionals:
      #if !macro 
        class BuildInMacroTests {}
        class MyModel {}
        class MyMacro {}
    • Keep your macros in seperate files:
          class BuildInMacroTests {
              public static function main() {
                  var s:MyModel = new MyModel();
                  MyMacro.doSomething( s );
          class MyModel extends sys.db.Object {
              var id:Int;
              var name:String;
          import haxe.macro.Expr;
          import haxe.macro.Context;
          class MyMacro {
              public static macro function doSomething(output : Expr) : Expr {
                  return output;

A combination of the 1st and 3rd solutions is probably usually the cleanest.

Good luck!

A Haxe/JS Debugging Tip

When targetting Haxe JS in Haxe 3, the output is “modern” style, which means, to prevent polluting the global namespace or conflicting with other libraries, the output is wrapped in a simple function:

(function() {})()

Which is great.  And if you place breakpoints in your code, using:


Then your browser will launch the debugger inside this Haxe context, and you have access to all your classes etc.  But what if you want to fire up the browser’s JS console, and gain arbitrary access to something in your Haxe code?  Because it’s all hidden inside that function, you can’t.

Unless you have a workaround, which looks like this:

class Client 
    @:expose("haxedebug") @:keep
    public static function enterDebug()

What’s going on: we have a class, and a function: “enterDebug”.  This function can go in any class that you use, really – it doesn’t have to be in Client or your Main class or anything.

The “js.Lib.debug()” statement launches the debugger in the haxe context, as described before.  But the “@:expose” metadata exposes this function outside of the Haxe context.  The string defines what we expose it as: rather than the default “Client.enterDebug()”, we’ll just have “haxedebug()”.  And the “@:keep” metadata makes sure this won’t get deleted by the compilers Dead Code Elimination, even though we may never explicitly call this function in our code.

Now that we’ve done that, recompile, and voilà!  You can type “haxedebug()” into the Javascript console and start fiddling around inside the Haxe context.  Enjoy.


Creating Complex URL Routing Schemes With haxe.web.Dispatch

Complex Routing Schemes with haxe.web.Dispatch

I’ve looked at haxe.web.Dispatch before, and I thought it looked really simple – in both a good and a bad way. It was easy to set up and fast. But at first it looked like you couldn’t do complex URL schemes with it.

Well, I was wrong.

At the WWX conference I presented some of the work I’ve done on Ufront, a web application framework built on top of Haxe. And I mentioned that I wanted to write a new Routing system for Ufront. Now, Ufront until now has had a pretty powerful routing system, but it was incredibly obese – using dozens of classes, thousands of lines of code and a lot of runtime type checking, which is usually pretty slow.

Dispatch on the other hand uses macros for a lot of the type checking, so it’s much faster, and it also weighs in at less than 500 lines of code (including the macros!), so it’s much easier to comprehend and maintain. To wrap my head around the ufront framework took me most of the day, following the code down the rabbit hole, but I was able to understand the entire Dispatch class in probably less than an hour. So that is good!

But there is still the question, is it versatile enough to handle complex URL routing schemes? After spending more time with it, and with the documentation, I found that it is a lot more flexible than I originally thought, and should work for the vast majority of use cases.

Learning by example

Take a look at the documentation to get an idea of general usage. There’s some stuff in there that I won’t cover here, so it’s well worht a read. Once you’ve got that understood, I will show how your API / Routing class might be structured to get various URL schemes:

If we want a default homepage:

function doDefault() trace ( "Welcome!" ); 

If we want to do a single page /about/:

function doAbout() trace ( "About us" ); 

If you would like to have an alias route, so a different URL that does the same thing:

inline function doAboutus() doAbout();

If we want a page with an argument in the route /help/{topic}/:

function doHelp( topic:String ) { 
 trace ( 'Info about $topic' ); 

It’s worth noting here that if topic is not supplied, an empty string is used. So you can check for this:

function doHelp( topic:String ) { 
 if ( topic == "" ) { 
 trace ( 'Please select a help topic' ); 
 else { 
 trace ( 'Info about $topic' ); 

Now, most projects get big enough that you might want more than one API project, and more than one level of routes. Let’s say we’re working on the haxelib website (a task I might take on soon), there are several pages to do with Projects (or haxelibs), so we might put them altogether in ProjectController, and we might want the routing to be available in /projects/{something}/.

If we want a sub-controller we use it like so:

 /projects/ => projectController.doDefault("")
 /projects/{name}/ => projectController.doDefault(name)
 /projects/popular/ => projectController.doPopular
 /projects/bytag/{tag}/ => projectController.doByTag(tag) 
function doProjects( d:Dispatch ) { 
 d.dispatch( new ProjectController() ); 

As you can see, that gives a fairly easy way to organise both your code and your URLs: all the code goes in ProjectController and we access it from /projects/. Simple.

With that example however, all the variable capturing is at the end. Sometimes your URL routing scheme would make more sense if you were to capture a variable in the middle. Perhaps you would like:


Even this can still be done with Dispatch (I told you it was flexible):

function doUsers( d:Dispatch, username:String ) { 
 if ( username == "" ) { 
 println("List of users"); 
 else { 
 d.dispatch( new UserController(username) ); 

And then in your username class:

class UserController { 
 var username:String; 
 public function new( username:String ) { 
 this.username = username; 
 function doDefault( project:String ) { 
 if ( project == "") { 
 println('$username\'s projects'); 
 else { 
 println('$username\'s $project project'); 
 function doContact() { 
 println('Contact $username'); 

So the username is captured in doUsers(), and then is passed on to the UserController, where it is available for all the possible controller actions. Nice!

As you can see, this better represents the heirarchy of your site – both your URL and your code are well structured.

Sometimes, it’s nice to give users a top-level directory. Github does this:


We can too. The trick is to put it in your doDefault action:

function doDefault( d:Dispatch, username:String ) {
  if ( username == "" ) { 
 else { 
 d.dispatch( new UserController(username) ); 

Now we can do things like:

/ => doDefault() 
/jason/ => UserController("jason").doDefault("") 
/jason/detox => UserController("jason").doDefault("detox") 
/jason/contact => UserController("jason").doContact() 
/projects/ => ProjectController.doDefault("") 
/about/ => doAbout() 

You can see here that Dispatch is clever enough to know what is a special route, like “about” or “projects/something”, and what is a username to be passed on to the UserController.

Finally, it might be the case that you want to keep your code in a separate controller, but you want to have it stay in the top level routing namespace.

To use a sub-controller add methods to your Routes class:

inline function doSignUp() (new AuthController()).doSignUp(); 
inline function doSignIn() (new AuthController()).doSignIn(); 
inline function doSignOut() (new AuthController()).doSignOut(); 

This will let the route be defined at the top level, so you can use /signup/ rather than /auth/signup/. But you can still keep your code clean and separate. Winning. The inline will also help minimise any performance penalty for doing things this way.

Comparison to Ufront/MVC style routing

Dispatch is great. It’s light weight so it’s really fast, and will be easier to extend or modify the code base, because it’s easier to understand. And it’s flexible enough to cover all the common use cases I could think of.

I’m sure if I twisted my logic far enough, I could come up with a situation that doesn’t fit, but for me this is a pretty good start.

There are three things the old Ufront routing could do that this can’t:

  1. Filtering based on whether the request is Post / Get etc. It was possible to do some other filtering also, such as checking authentication. I think all of this can be better achieved with macros rather than the runtime solution in the existing ufront routing framework.
  2. LocalizedRoutes, but I’m sure with some more macro love we could make even that work. Besides, I’m not sure that localized routes ever functioned properly in Ufront anyway ;)
  3. Being able to capture “controller” and “action” as variables, so that you can set up an automatic /{controller}/{action}/{...} routing system. While this does make for a deceptively simple setup, it is in fact quite complex behind the scenes, and not very type-safe. I think the “Haxe way” is to make sure the compiler knows what’s going on, so any potential errors are captured at compile time, not left for a user to discover.


I’ll definitely begin using this for my projects, and if I can convince Franco, I will make it the default for new Ufront projects. The old framework can be left in there in case people still want it, and so that we don’t break legacy code.

I’d like to implement a few macros to make things easier too.


var doUsers:UserController; 

Would automatically become:

function doUsers( ?d:Dispatch, username:String ) { 
 d.dispatch( new UserController(username) ); 

The arguments for “doUsers()” would match the arguments in the constructor of “UserController”. If “username” was blank, it would still be passed to UserController.default, which could test for a blank username and take the appropriate action.

I’d also like:

@:forward(doSignup, doSignin, doSignout) var doAuth:AuthController; 

To become:

function doAuth( ?d:Dispatch ) { 
 d.dispatch( new AuthController() ); 
inline function doSignup() (new AuthController()).doSignup(); 
inline function doSignin() (new AuthController()).doSignin(); 
inline function doSignout() (new AuthController()).doSignout(); 

Finally, it would be nice to have the ability to do different actions depending on the method. So something like:

@:method(GET) function doLogin() trace ("Please log in");

@:method(POST) function doLogin( args:{ user:String, pass:String } ) { 
 if ( attemptLogin(user,pass) ) { 
 trace ( 'Hello $user' ); 
 else { 
 trace ( 'Wrong password' ); 
function doLogin() { 
 trace ( "Why are you using a weird HTTP method?" ); 

This would compile to code:

function get_doLogin() { 
 trace ("Please log in") 

function post_doLogin( args:{ user:String, pass:String } ) { 
 if ( attemptLogin(user,pass) ) { 
 trace ( 'Hello $user' ); 
 else { 
 trace ( 'Wrong password' ); 

function doLogin() { 
 trace ( "Why are you using a weird HTTP method?" ) 

Then, if you do a GET request, it first attempts “get_doLogin”. If that fails, it tries “doLogin”.

The aim then, would be to write code as simple as:

class Routes { 
 function doDefault() trace ("Welcome!"); 
 var users:UserController; 
 var projects:ProjectController; 
 @:forward(doSignup, doSignin, doSignout) var doAuth:AuthController; 

So that you have a very simple, readable structure that shows how the routing flows through your apps.

When I get these macros done I will include them in ufront for sure.

Example Code

I have a project which works with all of these examples, in case you have trouble seeing how it fits together.

It is on this gist.

In it, I don’t use real HTTP paths, I just loop through a bunch of test paths to check that everything is working properly. Which it is… Hooray for Haxe!

It’s free, but do you mind paying?

Here’s something I’d like to see more of: UberWriter is free (open source, GPL3), yet by default if you go to install it you’ll have to pay $5.  The old “free as in freedom of speech” rather than “free as in free beer”.

From the creator’s point of view, “Free as in speech” means several things:

  • The project is open to collaboration – if you have something to add, please do!
  • If you see a different future for this project than I do, you don’t have to ask my permission.  You can build on what I’ve started and do something new and different.  I may or may not want what to merge your changes back in.
  • If you’re not someone that’s likely to pay me money (you have a different native language, you live in an area I can’t sell to, you’re don’t have enough money…) then that’s okay, feel free to take what I’ve done anyway and see if you can build on it.
  • If you’re really poor (developing world, unfunded startup, student) then you can still use the software and pay it back (or pay it forward) later.  I’m just glad people are using (and enjoying) something I’ve made.
  • If you’re worried about security, you can know exactly what your software is doing by getting a developer to audit the code.  I promise I’m not working for your corrupt government.
  • If I ever close shop and discontinue the product, you can keep using it, without having to worry about where to get new copies.  Feel free to make new copies, or to hire a developer to maintain it, even to release your own version.  I promise not to get angry.

But from the creator’s point of view, “free as in beer” has several negative implications:

  • I don’t have a strong plan to make money off this, so it will remain a side-project or a hobby.  I might love it, but I’ll never give it the time, money and support it needs to be amazing.
  • I have to pay my bills.  So the work I do that pays bills will always be more important than the work I do for this project.

Commercial projects that succeed (especially software projects) often have a founder who is hugely passionate about it, and absolutely stoked that they get to work on their passion as their full time job.  For many open source developers, this isn’t a reality.

So what if you want to balance those two things:

  1. Create, invent, make art.  And give it away to the world in the most generous, considerate way possible.
  2. Make money so that I can continue to develop this, perfecting it and supporting it and giving it every opportunity to succeed.

Well, that’s what UberWriter is doing.  It has all the same freedoms as “free as in speech”.  And if you really don’t want to pay for it, you can find ways to get it for free, and that’s allowed too, it’s not illegal and it won’t make the creator cry.  But, if you want to get it the easiest way, and you want to support the developer, it’s $5.

I hope he does well, makes some money, maybe even is able to make it his main job – so that he is empowered to make some good software become really great software.  And I hope to see more people balance this act of being generous with earning a living… myself included.

20 Questions I Asked Myself

Bernadette Jiwa is a marketing / branding / idea-spreading expert, (and a Perth local!), and when you subscribe to her “The Story of Telling” she sends you a PDF with 20 questions to ask yourself before launching your next product or idea.

At WWX 2013, this year’s Haxe conference, I’ll be presenting a talk on developing Web Apps, and using “ufront” to do that.  Ufront is a framework made by mostly by Franco Ponticelli, and initially modelled on the .NET MVC framework.  Ufront is pretty powerful, but it’s lacked documentation and hasn’t had a lot of users.  I’ve used it for my last project, added a bunch of helpers, and think it’s ready for some more attention.  A re-launch, if you will.

So I went through the 20 questions Bernadette gives in her PDF, and tried to apply it to ufront, Haxe and web-apps.

My answers to the “20 questions” for ufront (PDF)

It was pretty eye-opening, and really helped me zero in on why I think this approach is better than rails, django, node/express or other frameworks.  I came up with this tagline:

ufront: the client / server framework for Haxe that lets you write the next big (website/web-app/mobile-app/game/thing)

The new Map syntax in Haxe 3

I was using the Haxe3 Release Candidate for well over a month before I realised that the new Map data structures could be created with a nice syntax.  The basic gist is this:

var map1 = [ 1=>"one", 2=>"two", 3=>"three" ];

Like Arrays, but you use the “=>” operator to define both the key and the value.  And Haxe’s type inference is as strong as ever.  Here’s what the compiler picks up:

var map1 = [ 1=>"one", 2=>"two", 3=>"three" ];
$type (map1); // Map<Int, String>

var map2 = [ "one"=>1, "two"=>2, "three"=>3 ];
$type (map2); // Map<String, Int>

var map3 = [
    Date.now() => "Today",
    Date.now().delta(24*60*60*1000) => "Tomorrow",
    Date.now().delta(-24*60*60*1000) => "Yesterday"
$type (map3); // Map<Date, String>

var map4 = [
    { name: "Tony Stark" } => "Iron Man",
    { name: "Peter Parker" } => "Spider Man"
$type (map4); // Map<{ name : String }, String>

var map5 = [
    [1,2] => ["one","two"],
    [3,4] => ["three","four"],
$type (map5); // Map<Array<Int>, Array<String>>

So it’s pretty clever.  If for some reason you need to type explicitly to StringMap, IntMap, or ObjectMap, you can:

var stringMap:StringMap<Int> = [
    "One" => 1,
    "Two" => 2
$type(stringMap); // haxe.ds.StringMap<Int>

var intMap:IntMap<String> = [
    1 => "One",
    2 => "Two"
$type(intMap); // haxe.ds.IntMap<String>

var objectMap:ObjectMap<{ name:String }, String> = [
    { name: "Tony Stark" } => "Iron Man",
    { name: "Peter Parker" } => "Spider Man"
$type(objectMap); // haxe.ds.ObjectMap<{ name : String }, String>

But if you try to do anything too funky with types, the compiler will complain.  Haxe likes to keep things strictly typed:

var funkyMap = [
    { name: "Tony Stark" } => "Iron Man",
    { value: "Age" } => 25
]; // Error: { value : String } has no field name ... 
   // you are a bad person, and your items are not comprehensible 
   // to Haxe's typing system

Finally, Haxe won’t let you do define duplicate keys using this syntax:

var mapWithDuplicates = [
    1 => "One",
    2 => "Two",
    1 => "uno"
]; // Error: Duplicate Key ... previously defined (somewhere)

If you’re using an object map, it’s only a duplicate if you’re dealing with the exact same object, not a similar one.  For example, this is allowed:

var similarObjectKeys:ObjectMap<Array<Int>, String> = [
    [0] => "First Array object",
    [0] => "Second Array object"
]; // Works, you now have 2 items in your map.

But if you use the exact same object, Haxe will pick it up:

var key = [0];
var sameObjectKey = [
    key => "First Array object",
    key => "Second Array object"
]; // Error: Duplicate Key ...

So there you have it.  A nice feature that I didn’t see mentioned anywhere else.  Thanks Haxe team!



It’s worth mentioning that once you have created your map, you can use array access (“[” and “]”) to read or modify entries in your map.

var map = [ 1=>"one", 2=>"two", 3=>"three" ];

// Reading a value
map[1];   "one"
var i = 2;
map[i];   "two"
map[++i]; "three"

// Setting a value
map[4] = "four";
map[1] = "uno";
map[i] = "THREE";
map;   // [ 1=>"uno", 2=>"two", 3=>"THREE", 4=>"four" ]

Trying to understand dependency injection

Coming closer to the end of writing my first really complex app, I’m beginning to wish I’d taken the time at the start to properly learn and grasp some of the concepts that I see other programmers using.  My client-side code uses a basic MVC pattern, but a bunch of Flash Developers use something that to me comes across as much more complex – as seen in RobotLegs or some of the Haxe ports, such as MMVC.

These frameworks are all about Inversion Of Control (and because we love acronyms: IOC).  And they use Dependency Injection (DI) to do this.  You can see already why the learning curve can be steep, especially if you haven’t come across this pattern before.

So today I googled “I don’t understand dependency injection” and got this fantastic explanation by Kevin William Pang.  I found that really helpful, and I’m sold.  I’d been wondering how the hell I was supposed to unit-test some of my more complex client code anyway… If you’re one that, like me, hasn’t understood this concept in much detail: his article is well worth a read, I won’t bother to try and explain it here.

But, I’m still not sure where the fancy dependency injection tools and frameworks come in.  I see the value in it, and I think “injecting” it into the constructor by using arguments given to the constructor seems just fine.  Meanwhile, the tools which are supposed to help, such as SwiftSuspenders or Minject seem to me to be really verbose, and not offer a lot more than the constructor method.

Maybe that style is more relevant for gaming.  Or maybe it’s benefits show up with more complex projects.  Or maybe I just haven’t been enlightened.

Either way, I’ll try to get enlightened… I think it’s worth spending time learning these patterns.  They’ve obviously gained traction for a reason, and a lot of better developers than me swear by them, so I’ll try wrap my head around it.  Maybe one day it’ll seem as clear to me as MVC, or even OOP do now (both of which took me a while at first).

If you have any suggestions / comments / explanations – I’d love to hear them in the comments section.

Haxe3 Features: Variable Substitution in Haxe3 (aka String Interpolation)

One of my favourite features in the upcoming Haxe3 is also one of the simplest: String Interpolation (also called variable substitution).  If you were using Std.format() in Haxe2, you’ll recognise it.  It lets you do this:

var name = "Jason";
var age = 25;
trace ('My name is $name, I am $age years old.');
// My name is Jason, I am 25 years old

The first point to make is that it is triggered by using single quotation marks (‘), rather than double (“).  If you use double quotes, everything is treated as a plain string:

trace ("My name is $name, I am $age years old.");
// My name is $name, I am $age years old

The next point to make is that this all happens at compile time.  So the trace we made above, in Javascript, would output as:

console.log("My name is " + name + ", I am " + age + " years old");

So you can only do this with strings you have at compile time, as you’re writing the code.  If you want Strings that are given at runtime to have variable interpolation, you should use a templating library like erazor.

Now a few other things to note:

  1. If you want to put in a normal dollars sign, you can use two $, like this:
    trace ('The item costs $20');
    // "20" is not a valid variable name, so it is ignored.
    // Same as ("The " + item + " costs $20");
    trace ('That price is in $USD');
    // Error: Unknown Identifier "USD"
    trace ('That price is in $$USD');
    // Same as ("That price is in $" + "USD");
    var cost = 25;
    trace ('That item costs $$$cost');
    // The first two "$" are for the literal sign, the third is part of the variable.
    // Same as ("That item costs $" + cost);
  2. If you want to access anything more than a straight variable, use curly brackets:
    // Property access
    trace ('My name is ${user.name} and I am ${user.age} years old.');
    // Same as: "My name is " + user.name + " and I am " + user.age + " years old.";
    // Outputs: My name is jason and I am 25 years old.
    // A simple haxe expression
    trace ('$x + $y = ${x + y}');
    // Same as: "" + x + " + " + y + " = " + (x + y);
    // Outputs: 1 + 2 = 3
    // A function call 
    trace ('The closest Int to Pi is ${Math.round(3.14159)}');
    // Same as: "The closest Int to Pi is " + Math.round(3.14159);
    // Outputs: The closest Int to Pi is 3
  3. There is no HTML escaping, so be careful:
    var bold = "<b>Bold</b>";
    trace ('<i>Italic</i> $bold');
    // <i>Italic</i> <b>Bold</b>
    var safeBold = StringTools.htmlEscape("<b>Bold</b>");
    trace ('<i>Italic</i> $safeBold');
    // <i>Italic</i> &lt;b&gt;Bold&lt;/b&gt;
    var safeEverything = StringTools.htmlEscape('<i>Italic</i> $bold');
    trace (safeEverything);
    // &lt;i&gt;Italic&lt;/i&gt; &lt;b&gt;Bold&lt;/b&gt;

There you have it: String Interpolation, one of the most helpful (and easy to comprehend) features of the upcoming Haxe3 release.

Mapping any SSH Server to a Network Drive in Ubuntu

My friend Justin showed me a cool trick this week – mapping any SSH server as a network drive in Ubuntu.  This is really useful for web development, where you have a whole bunch of servers that you have to connect to, transfer files to and from, and make small edits.

The integration is pretty seamless – it shows up in my file browser (just like a local USB drive), I can open files in any app I want, and every time I save the changes are synced back.  Pretty cool.

Here’s how:

  1. Open your Home Folder
  2. In the menu, choose “File -> Connect to Server”
  3. Change the type to “SSH”
  4. Enter the address of your server.
    eg. myvps.mydomain.com or
  5. Enter your username and password.
    (Note: If you have public / private keys set up, just enter the username.)
  6. Click Connect

This all comes built in with Ubuntu 12.04.

This is me browsing files on an Amazon EC2 instance, opening a few of them and editing them. Sweet!

A new project: OurSchoolDiary

So I’m working on a new project that has been brewing in my mind for a while. I’m going to aim to have a working prototype by the end of August, have users beta testing through till December and hopefully have my first paying clients by next year.

A screenshot of some of the first code for the project.

What is it?

The App is called “OurSchoolDiary”. It lets each school create their own School Diary app, where students can sign up and keep track of their homework, assignments and tests. The big win over competing solutions is that here, when the teacher adds an assessment or task, it automatically shows up in the students diary. We’re helping even unorganised students stay on top of their work.

On top of that, we’ll let parents receive emails informing them of their child’s progress. This way parents and teachers can work together to make sure they support their child’s education as much as possible.

And the final advantage, the school gets to show off how cutting-edge they are because they get their own “app”.  Logo and everything!

A Blog

As I go, I hope to keep track of my progress on this blog. (I’ll post to this category specifically, so you can subscribe by RSS).

Why keep a blog?

  • For the history, in case it is ever significant
  • For my own reflection and understanding, regardless of if it is a success.
  • To show off some cool technologies I’m using:
    • Web Apps – I’m not aiming for distribution through the App Store, I’m going a full HTML stack. Not even a hybrid using PhoneGap. This is a page you can view in a browser, and use offline, and the experience will be identical.
    • Haxe – this is a sweet programming language that lets you target Flash, Javascript, PHP, Java, C#, C++ and a platform called Neko. Up until now it’s main success has been in the indie-games market, but I believe it is mature enough to work for a full web-based productivity app.  Client and server. We’ll find out how that goes!
  • To look back on my decision making processes after we’ve launched, and see if my thinking was accurate.
  • To raise interest in the project
  • To explore some of the topics I find fascinating:
    • Usability
    • Design
    • New Marketing
    • Business Strategy
    • Contribution to the community
    • And a few more…

That’s all for now. I’ll try submit a couple of posts a week (at least) until I get this thing off the ground.